Skip to main content

Dual clumped isotope thermometry of speleothems

Speleothem carbonates are key archives for the reconstruction of terrestrial paleo-environmental conditions, but it is challenging to resolve between the temperature, hydrological and kinetic information that is recorded in their stable isotopic composition. Recently, it has been demonstrated that dual clumped isotope thermometry, i.e., analysis of Δ48 alongside Δ47 in CO2 evolved from phosphoric acid digestion of carbonate [1], holds the potential to detect and quantify kinetic departures from isotopic equilibrium without having to know the oxygen isotope composition of the parent water, and, moreover, to correct for kinetic biases in carbonate formation temperatures [2].

We performed paired Δ4748 measurements on speleothems to investigate to which extent isotopic disequilibrium is recorded in these archives. No significant disequilibrium bias is recorded in slowly grown pool carbonates and cryogenic carbonates, and Δ47 derived temperatures agree with expected formation temperatures. Most stalagmites, sampled closest to their growth axis where disequilibrium should be least pronounced, record a slight, but significant -Δ47 disequilibrium bias. While the bulk set of investigated stalagmites exhibits a significant +Δ48 offset from equilibrium, the extent of Δ48 disequilibrium in individual samples remains below analytical resolution. Disequilibrium biases originate from rapid dehydration/dehydroxylation of bicarbonate occurring dissolved in the drip water. These results demonstrate that stalagmite Δ47 values, without any additional evidence, should only be considered upper estimates of cave temperature, even if corresponding dual clumped data plots indistinguishably from the Δ4748 equilibrium line.

[1[ Fiebig et al. (2019), Chem. Geol. 522, 186-191

[2] Bajnai et al. (2020) Nat. Commun. 11:4005

Details

Author
Jens* Fiebig1, Christoph Spoetl2, Ana Moreno-Caballud3, Haiwei Zhang4, Gabriella Koltai2, Gina Moseley2, Miguel Bernecker1, Philip Staudigel1, Monika Markowska5, Hubert Vonhof6
Institutionen
1Goethe University Frankfurt, Germany; 2University of Innsbruck, Austria; 3CSIC Zaragoza, Spain; 4Xi'an Jiaotong University, China; 5Northumbria University, UK; 6MPI Mainz, Germany
Veranstaltung
Geo4Göttingen 2025
Datum
2025
DOI
10.48380/v8pp-m864