Skip to main content

Optimizing the effect of geological 3D prints

3D prints have proven to be a powerful visualization tool, captivating the interest of the general public and sparking meaningful discussions. However, simply translating digital geological models into 3D files for printing can complicate the process and diminish engagement with the resulting physical prints. Addressing these challenges necessitates optimizing the geological models specifically for 3D printing.

While digital geological 3D models offer flexibility in displaying various geological information, 3D prints are inherently more static. Strategic contextual edits can focus the print on key complexities, guiding viewers towards deeper comprehension. However, caution must be exercised to avoid misinterpretation or confusion through excessive exaggeration or simplification.

The diverse range of printing technologies and materials available requires a thorough understanding of their constraints and limitations, while also claiming the advantages they offer. Models should be tailored for seamless printing on the chosen type of machine, minimizing the need for adjustments or extensive post-processing

Decisions regarding color are crucial in the printing process, as they can significantly influence the effectiveness of the prints based on the context of the models and the target audience.

By meticulously addressing these aspects, 3D prints can serve as compelling introductions to complex digital geological 3D models and the broader topic of geology.

Details

Author
Kai Damerau1, Izabela Grunwald1, Stephanie Lehnert1, Janik Liebkowsky1, Thomas Haupt1
Institutionen
1Geologisches Landesamt, BUKEA Hamburg
Veranstaltung
GeoSaxonia 2024
Datum
2024
DOI
10.48380/zet6-6g34
Geolocation
Hamburg