Skip to main content

The dual-clumped isotope thermometer as a tool to identify and correct for isotopic disequilibrium in the clumped isotope composition of biogenic carbonate

The clumped isotope composition (∆47) of marine biogenic carbonates is an increasingly applied proxy for temperature reconstruction. The clumped isotope measurement is particularly valuable as ∆47 is independent of the δ18O of seawater. However, kinetic effects during biomineralization can impact the ∆47 of some marine archives, impeding accurate paleotemperature reconstruction.

Dual carbonate clumped isotope thermometry (i.e., simultaneous ∆47 and ∆­48 measurements on a single carbonate) has the potential to identify kinetically driven isotopic disequilibrium in biogenic carbonate and facilitate the reconstruction of carbonate formation temperature independent of kinetic biases. We present the dual-clumped isotope compositions of several key marine archives, historically used to reconstruct changes in sea surface temperature and δ18O across the Phanerozoic. These include brachiopods, cold and warm-water corals, and belemnites.

Corals and brachiopods exhibit disequilibrium ∆47 and ∆48, corresponding kinetic effects relating to mixing of an equilibrium DIC pool with kinetically derived HCO3- produced by hydration and hydroxylation of CO2. We demonstrate how measurement of the dual clumped isotope composition of corals and brachiopods can be used to correct for kinetic bias in ∆47, yielding more accurate temperature reconstructions (<±3°C at the 95% confidence interval). Dual clumped isotope thermometry, therefore, (re-)opens brachiopod and coral archives for reconstruction of shallow and intermediate water mass temperatures on geological timescales. Furthermore, we confirm that belemnites precipitate calcite in dual-clumped isotope equilibrium yielding precise growth temperatures, thus belemnite ∆47 may be reliably used as a proxy for Mesozoic sea surface temperatures (<±2.5°C at the 95% confidence interval).

Details

Author
Amelia Davies1, Uwe Brand2, Jacek Raddatz1, Eberhard Gischler1, Gregory Price3, Weifu Guo4, Miguel Bernecker1, Mattia Tagliavento1, Jens Fiebig1
Institutionen
1Institut für Geowissenschaften, Goethe Universität, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; 2Department of Earth Sciences, Brock university, St. Catherines, Ontario, Canada.; 3Department of Geological Sciences, The University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK; 4Department of Geology and Geophysics, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, United States
Veranstaltung
GeoMinKöln 2022
Datum
2022
DOI
10.48380/5mw6-q913
Geolocation
Global